Project Overview

Over the last ten years, 3D printing has risen from an expensive and relatively obscure manufacturing method to a mainstay in the Arts, Science, Technology, Medical, and Engineering Fields. The many benefits of 3D printing are utilized by researchers, manufacturers and hobbyists alike: fast prototyping and turnaround time, ease of use, affordability, and accessibility. The uses for 3D printing are endless; the manufacturing technique is used to make medical implants and prosthetics more customized and affordable, replacement parts accessible, and the imagination realizable. People have created prosthetics, solar cells, organs, bicycles, furniture, guitars, food and much more.

In most cases, the use of 3D printing, an additive manufacturing process, creates a net reduction of waste; typical manufacturing currently has a scrap (waste) rate saturated at 21%among professionals. Our experience with learners new to 3D printing is much higher, estimated at 60%. The continued increase in utilization of 3D printing has the potential to reduce the scrap rate to roughly 10% in the next 25 years. Furthermore, the waste produced from PLA 3D printers is free from contaminants and is considered biodegradable. Alongside these benefits, local or on-site 3D printing such as can be found at universities, community makerspaces, or even inside homes reduces packaging and fuel consumption from product shipment.

Unfortunately, as the popularity of 3D printers increases and as the printing material becomes more affordable and accessible, there is the potential for a net increase in total waste. Waste from 3D printing is created in two primary ways. Structures, such as supports and rafts, are printed alongside the model to prevent deformation. These are then removed from the print and thrown away. The second way is through failed prototypes and design mistakes. During any development process, project success is a result of optimization and learning from errors – usually in 3D printing the entire model is scrapped in favor of the newer version. Students, technicians, and hobbyists are developing and iterating prototypes much more quickly as a result of this technology. Even in the best case scenario, if we combine the 10% scrap rate with the growing popularity of 3D printing (20.6% per year based on market value) we see that action in this area is needed in order for the University of California to hit the zero waste mark by 2020.

So what exactly is being thrown away? The answer is: Plastic. The two most commonly used plastics in 3D printing are polylactic acid (PLA) and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS). Some may object here, “aren’t those already recyclable? I heard you can even compost PLA.” While this is technically true there are some important caveats:

  • PLA is derived from biomass (often sugarcane or corn starch) and is biodegradable. However, special conditions are necessary to biodegrade this material effectively; industrial composting can decompose PLA within 3 months. Compare this with 100 – 1000 years it would take in a landfill. Although these facilities exist in California, waste from 3D printing often does not end up in one, due to the lack of education and logistical impediments.
  • ABS is derived from petroleum and does not biodegrade. It is, however, recyclable. Unfortunately, you often find a trash bin next to 3D printers, not recycling bins.

 

Our goal with this project is to address plastic waste from 3D printing, and identify solutions before it becomes the problem becomes unmanageable. Our team, in coordination with the Sustainability Lab at UC Santa Cruz, has a two-fold plan to increase the rate of 3D material recycling:

  1. By reforming and reusing waste plastic material (both PLA and ABS)
  2. By educating users both on and off campus in the proper disposal of 3D printing waste

On 1)

As part of our goal to achieve zero net waste, we plan to characterize the feasibility of on-site recycling and reusing plastic waste from local 3D printers and quantify potential impacts. To accomplish this, we will purchase a filament extruder for our small pilot program: the ProtoCycler by ReDeTec, which will grind, melt down and extrude the recycled plastic as new plastic filament for 3D printing with up to an 80% recovery rate. This means that waste plastic will not only be recycled, but the consumption of new plastic will be reduced!

Since plastic quality is always downsized during recycling, part of the investigation will be to optimize the percentage of new plastic material used to maintain usable quality. We will also experiment with other plastics commonly found in waste, such as water bottles. This process will require some research and testing before the recycled filament can be used in actual production. We have identified the FlashForge CreatorPro as a relatively inexpensive 3D printer that has the flexibility to accommodate different materials. By testing the recycled filament on a dedicated printer, we will reduce downtime and potential damage to expensive equipment due to the experimental filament. While ABS and other plastics are generally able to be recycled, this process requires specialized facilities, transportation (sometimes as far as China) and tremendous energy, resulting in an increased carbon footprint. With this proposal, we hope to maximize waste reduction locally while maintaining quality printing capabilities, thus minimize transport associated with sourcing materials and their end of life. All this while ultimately reducing the necessity of purchasing virgin plastic material that will ultimately end up in the waste stream.

The recycled material will be collected in special bins placed at locations around campus and in the town of Santa Cruz. Facilities considered for the initial phase include: the Digital Arts and New Media Studios, the Sustainability Lab, the Center for Information Research Technology in the Interest of Society (CITRIS), Baskin Engineering Lab Support (BELS), the Artist Co-op at Porter College and Idea Fab Labs in Santa Cruz. As part of writing this proposal, we have interviewed these facility managers to try and understand what percentage of new materials used in these 3D printers goes to scrap and found it difficult to pin down a number. Part of our study will help articulate current practice to better understand the life cycle of 3D printing materials here in Santa Cruz.

A Summary of the Costs for Part 1

Item Number Item Cost Source
ProtoCycler 1299.99 redetec.com
2. FlashForge 899.00 flashforge-usa.com
3. Collection Bins 15x 10.95 cleanriver.com
Part 1 Total = 2363.24

 

On 2)

The second part of our plan is to educate the users of 3D printers and the campus/community as a whole about the reduction of waste and appropriate recycling methods. Though the majority of the collected 3D printing waste will be generated locally, we believe it is still important to spread awareness regarding proper disposal techniques for waste from 3D printers and other fabrication processes to other campuses, facilities, and potential users. To achieve this goal, we will launch a media outreach campaign to engage the local community about zero waste principles. The focused message about 3D printing and other prototyping waste will be framed as part of the larger My Last Trash movement in an informative video infographic. Additionally, the video will be accompanied by instructive posters intended to be displayed near our material collection bins. Part of our strategy is to launch a campus-wide contest to design these outreach materials; buzz around the contest will help further spread the My Last Trash message. When the competition and design are completed, the posters will be printed and displayed and the video will be shared across various social media platforms to reach other communities, makerspaces, artist hubs and more.

The estimated costs are:

 

Item Number Item Cost Source
1. Printing costs 208.00 www.printrunner.com
2. Student Hours 100.00 10 hrs at $10/hr
3. Video Stipend 400.00 For production costs
4. Competition Prize 500.00 Provided by donor match
5. Videography Equipment 245/day Donated for project
Part 2 Total= 700 (roughly 1000 match)
Overall Total= 3069.24

 

This proposal has the potential to offset 100% of waste from 3D printers in the Santa Cruz community. While the net total waste from this sector may currently be small, having a system in place to scale in step with 3D printing growth will prevent the problem from getting out of hand. Further research into other post-consumer plastics may offer a future where the majority of 3D printing is completed using at least partially recycled material. Thinking beyond just UCSC, a successful program here could be implemented at other UC campuses and communities around the globe, making 3D printed waste #MyLastTrash.